Category: Research

Various measures to improve your critical thinking skills in the workplace

The process of evaluating data to find the best solution to a problem or topic is known as critical thinking. It is possible to make well-informed judgments that result in beneficial outcomes by utilizing your own experience, logic, observation, and contact with others.
We’ll cover how to sharpen your critical thinking abilities at work in this post so you can be a more productive worker.

Why critical thinking is important?

In the workplace, critical thinkers are highly valued since businesses are constantly in need of better, more knowledgeable answers. Specifically, using critical thinking in the workplace benefits you in:

  • Improve decision-making, evaluate an argument’s validity and its potential impact
  • Form your own opinions on a topic, develop your ethics and confidence
  • Engage on a deeper, more intellectual level with your coworkers and supervisors to form stronger working relationships
  • Evaluate your work to determine ways to improve quality and efficiency
  • Develop better comprehension skills, both in conversation and reading

How to improve critical thinking?

Here are a few strategies for enhancing critical thinking abilities at work so you can be a more valuable employee:

1. Become more self-aware

Analyzing your mental process, values, morality, ethics, and other views is a necessary step toward developing more self-awareness. What convictions do you hold? Which ideals are reflected in your thoughts? Regarding your preferences, be objective. Comprehending your inclinations, advantages, disadvantages, and prejudices might aid in your understanding of why you approach particular circumstances in a particular way.

2. Understand your mental process

Determine and assess how you take in and use information. Gaining better mental efficiency at work requires knowing how to listen, interpret, and then respond to information.
You may identify your preconceptions and how they affect judgments and solutions if you are a critical thinker. You can act more objectively at work if you give your decision-making process more thought.

3. Develop foresight

Think about the opinions of others on a circumstance or choice you make. Analyze the situation’s potential results and what may, in a good or bad way, alter. Making the appropriate decision at work will be aided by your ability to anticipate the effects of your actions.

Read: Explore various kinds of evaluation in education management

4. Practice active listening

A fundamental component of good critical thinking is active listening. When coworkers and bosses are speaking, pay close attention to what they are saying. Show empathy and concentrate on comprehending their point of view. Knowing exactly what people need, want, or anticipate can help you respond appropriately and have a fruitful conversation afterward.

5. Ask questions

Ask questions whenever you’re unsure. Make sure you have all the details right by starting with what you already know. To find out whether you truly understand, ask to have points repeated or think about rephrasing in your own words. To obtain information that could have been omitted or misunderstood, think about following up with inquiries. Next, determine whether anything is a concept, an opinion, or a fact by questioning yourself. This phase might assist you in giving a piece of information a purpose and value.

6. Evaluate existing evidence

Make use of prior knowledge and data to inform your present critical thinking decision. Have you ever worked on a project or faced a similar difficulty before? What insights did that experience give you? You can find a more useful and practical way to operate within your current circumstances by gathering information, organizing facts, and drawing on prior experience as supporting documentation.

Tips for improving critical thinking skills

There are many ways to improve your critical thinking skills during your career development, including:

Meeting with a mentor

Apart from facilitating problem-solving and decision-making together, having a mentor may help you acquire other talents. They may have tools to assist you in honing your critical thinking abilities, or they can assist you in maintaining attention while applying critical thinking strategies.

Participating in team-building exercises

Enhancing critical thinking abilities in both individuals and groups is the goal of many team-building activities. Make sure to take part in these exercises if your organization uses them. If your company doesn’t, you may still benefit from showing examples to your colleagues at a meeting.

Asking for leadership opportunities

Making crucial decisions and handling dispute resolution may fall under your role as a leader. These are practical duties that call for sharp critical thinking abilities. To hone these abilities, think about proposing to oversee a brand-new project or helping a teammate through training.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

The use of observation, interview, and content analysis in qualitative research

Observation in qualitative research

Direct observation may be a valuable tool for collecting data in qualitative research. You can get certain kinds of information best by looking them over directly. For instance, the materials used in construction, the number of rooms used for different purposes, the size of the rooms, the quantity of furniture and equipment, the presence or absence of certain amenities, and other pertinent details are some features of a school structure. By contrasting these facilities with realistic benchmarks that have already been established by expert opinion and investigation, their sufficiency may be ascertained. However, data collection by observation becomes considerably more complicated when studying human subjects in activity is involved. You need to know “what to look for” and “how to look for” in this situation. You have to be able to tell the difference between elements of the case that are important and those that are not at all relevant to the inquiry. This necessitates identifying the circumstances in which observational methods are effective.

The obvious conduct of people in everyday situations is the focus of observation. The overt behavior of individuals in everyday situations is a significant area of study in human observation. Under the artificially created conditions of a laboratory, it is not profitable to observe many significant features of human behavior. Descriptive research methods aim to characterize behavior in its natural environment. Observation as a research method has to be methodical, narrowly focused, well documented, and guided by a clear goal. It needs to go through the standard processes of validity, reliability, and accuracy tests like any other research technique. The observer has to be aware of exactly what to watch out for and notice.

Observations may be direct or indirect, scheduled or unscheduled, and known or unknown. A more normal view of activity may be observed from unknown, unscheduled, indirect observations such as through a one-way-vision glass. People are known to have committed minor crimes to get a true picture of prison conditions.

Read: Research proposal and its different components. A guide to writing the research report

When presented with different options or circumstances, observational research enables the researcher to see what their subjects do.
Studying non-experimental scenarios where behavior is noted and observed falls under this umbrella phrase. The phrase “what’s going on or what’s she doing” might also be used. Since the variables in the study are not controlled or altered, it is categorized as non-experimental.

Interviews in qualitative research

One excellent method for conducting research is interviewing people. Compared to other research methodologies, they let you collect richer data and make more thorough findings by accounting for emotional responses, spontaneous reactions, and nonverbal indicators. Individuals are more likely to divulge information orally than in paper, therefore information will be provided more freely and completely during an interview than it would be on a questionnaire. There are indeed several benefits to the cordial exchange during an interview that come with restricted, faceless questionnaire interactions.

Probably the oldest and most common method the man uses to get knowledge is the interview. Face-to-face interactions take place as the interviewer poses questions to the responder, also known as the interviewee, with the goal of eliciting information relevant to the study’s concerns.

In-person interviews allow you, the interviewer, to continuously support and guide the interviewees as they delve further into a topic. You can learn things from an interviewee that can’t be expressed in written responses, such as accidental remarks, body language, and tone of voice. The visual and aural cues also assist you in maintaining the private conversation’s speed and tone to extract private and sensitive information and learn about the subjects’ motives, emotions, attitudes, and beliefs.

Interviews differ in their nature, goal, and extent. They might be carried out for advice or study. You can limit them to one person or give them to several individuals. There are, in essence, three primary uses for interviews.
a. It may be applied as an exploratory tool to help find variables and relationships, provide recommendations for hypotheses, and direct the next research stages.
b. It is capable of being employed as a research tool. In this instance, the research will include questions intended to gauge its variables. Consequently, rather than being merely information-gathering tools, these questions are regarded as items in a psychometric instrument.

Content analysis in qualitative research

It may be used to enhance other research methods in a study by tracking down unexpected outcomes, verifying other approaches, and delving more into respondents’ motivations and the reasons behind their responses. Qualitative data often comprises rich, subjective information that is expressed verbally and includes detailed details. Reading a lot of transcripts in search of patterns or distinctions, then identifying themes, and creating categories are all necessary steps in the analysis of qualitative data. To categorize data, researchers have traditionally used colored pens and “cut and paste.” These days, the procedure is comparatively simpler because of the usage of software made expressly for managing qualitative data, which significantly lowers technical complexity and makes the tedious work easier. Numerous computer software programs have been created to automate the process of “coding” and to search and retrieve data. This essay provides examples of how to apply them in the process of analyzing qualitative data. The following describes the fundamental characteristics and main instruments that help qualitative researchers organize and examine their data.

Qualitative data analysis requires a 5-step process:

Prepare and organize your data.

Collect your notes, papers, and other materials, and print off your transcripts. Include any demographic data you may have gathered, the source, and any other information that can aid in the analysis of your data.

Review and explore the data.

To gain an understanding of the contents of your data, you will need to read it through, most likely more than once. You might wish to jot down any questions you have or any thoughts or suggestions you have.

Create initial codes.

Make use of idea maps, sticky notes, highlighters, and other tools that will help you make a connection between your facts and yourself. Please refer to the accompanying paper, which shows how to highlight important words and phrases and annotate the margins to organize the data.

Review those codes and revise or combine them into themes.

Identify recurring themes, language, opinions, and beliefs.

Present themes in a cohesive manner.

Think about your target audience, the goal of the research, and the information that will best help your data tell its narrative.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

Research proposal and its different components. A guide to writing the research report

It is conventional for students doing research for a degree to first submit an overview or research proposal to the faculty for approval. The research adviser evaluates the value of the proposed study and talks with the student about the appropriateness of the chosen topic and the suggested study design. The faculty’s review aids in elucidating the students’ thoughts regarding the appropriateness of the problem chosen and the suggested technique. Additionally, the student saves a significant amount of time and effort by not having to spend it on a poorly constructed study that would have been rejected.

Though there is some variation in the format prescribed by different universities, the following information is most often required about the research proposal:

• Statement of the problem.
• Purpose, objective, and significance of the study.
• Definitions, assumptions, and limitations.
• Review of related literature.
• Theoretical framework.
• Hypotheses and questions.
• Proposed research procedures.
• Time schedule.

The aforementioned topics will be covered in detail in the upcoming parts, giving you the confidence to create a research proposal.

As you may remember, research is done when the intended goal appears to be tough to achieve. Research in this area is required as the existing testing method is only recognized for promoting memorization and does not assist in identifying potential. Conversely, because the family planning program is not assisting in slowing down the pace of population increase, a study on family planning practices and current attitudes towards different family planning devices must be done. The application of research to real-world issues is what makes it so valuable. Research should be appropriately conveyed to field people for it to be useful.

Read: Analysis of reforms in Pakistani secondary education curriculum: research proposal

The basic purpose of the research report is to communicate to others in the field, complete and accurate information about what was done, how it was done, and what results were obtained.

How to Write the Research Report: A Guide

The writing of the research report should be undertaken after all the data have been collected and analyzed, and the conclusions based on these data have been drawn and firmly established. The researcher should follow the outline that he submitted for the approval of his adviser/thesis committee. However, the preliminary research outline should only serve as a guide. Sometimes changes are introduced in the course of conducting a research study because the preliminary tryout may indicate that certain methods should be abandoned and new ones introduced. The research report should reflect what was done. The research report should describe as clearly, directly, and briefly as possible exactly how the research was conducted, how the data were collected, and how the conclusions were drawn.

Clarity is the best quality of a study report. Experience has proven that removing any superfluous, pointless, and unnecessary information from the report may help it become more clear. The writer should not disrespect the intellect of the people for whom the research reports are made or waste his time, since they are all familiar with the fundamentals of the subject and have a basic understanding of the background information. If the writer feels that a certain amount of basic background information is necessary, he should only mention it very briefly.

There should be thorough documentation in the research report. This implies that every assertion should have its source cited. Please note that the following claims do not require supporting documentation.
• claims that are regarded as fundamental presumptions, such as the following: using audio-visual aids enhances teaching-learning environments, production is required for the development of human resources, and education investments provide greater rates of return.
• statements based on firsthand observation, such as the inability of primary school pupils to remain still for extended periods, the reluctance of women to discuss their age relative to that of males, the tendency of eastern mothers to be overly protective of their children, etc.

Standard Format of the Research Report

There are several excellent and appropriate methods to deliver a research report in writing; there is no one right approach. However, some types of information must always be provided. Because of this, the reports’ formats are essentially the same.
The fresh information collected from the research investigation forms the fundamental basis of the research report. However, the research report has to make it very apparent what the issue was and how it was investigated to demonstrate that this new information is pertinent and useful. Therefore, there are three main sections in every study report, which are as follows:

1) The introductory explanation

2) The presentation of the data collected and its analysis

3) A summary of the general conclusions.

Documentation may be included in the text itself or the form of footnotes. Regardless of the format, the source from which the statement was derived as well as the author to whom credit is due must be mentioned. If the assertion came from a written, published source, it should be stated with the publication’s title, publisher’s name, and year of release. Documentation should be used to provide credit to the expert who provided the view.

Read: The significance of samples in research. Discuss various sampling techniques

Nature and Background of the Study

A research report should begin with an introduction that covers the purpose and context of the study as well as setting the scene for the main body of work. The study’s justification is given in this section. The primary subjects that need to be covered in this section are.

A. Statement of the problem:

The problem statement should be concise and direct. Just describe the study’s purpose and topic matter at this point. No rationale for doing the study has to be given. Giving a clear image of the study’s topic and the framework it will be done inside should be the goal.

B. Reasons for doing the research:

Here, the researcher has to explain why the study was carried out. A reader should be able to comprehend the challenges and barriers encountered in the field that made the study necessary after reading this subsection.

C. Review of related literature:

The researcher should acknowledge what was already understood about the issue before beginning his investigation. Any gaps in prior information may be highlighted, and shortcomings in the approaches used by earlier researchers may be identified. In a sense, the evaluation of relevant literature would provide his findings even more support. It is not necessary to attempt to present a review of every piece of literature that is currently accessible on the subject. Reviewing previous research should only include information that is pertinent to the components of the issue that the study addresses.

D. Further elaboration of the problem:

This subsection addresses topics such as problem delimitation, subproblems, hypotheses taken into consideration during research project development, etc.

F. General hypothesis:

At this point, the researcher ought to outline the hypothesis he intends to investigate. As such, the introductory chapter needs to set the reader up for the primary study and its conclusions. As previously said, if a chapter gets too long, it could be divided into two or more chapters. The division of the chapter is what explains the surface variations across various report formats.

Read: Observation types and record-keeping methods

Approach to Data Analysis and Presentation

This section of the research report constitutes the essential core. It is here that actual research is described in de’tails4nd the basic data collected are presented.

A. Actual steps followed in the course of the research:

If feasible, the researcher should provide enough data about his process so that other researchers might recreate the work if they so want.

B. Tools employed in data collection:

Every tool used in the research for collecting data—tests, surveys, forms, etc.—should be explained. The Appendix after the text should provide an example of each of these instruments. It should also be made clear why each of these tools was utilized and what stage of the study it was used for:

C. Validity and reliability of instruments:

The validity and reliability of the instruments employed determine the level of trust that can be put in the study findings. The researcher must furnish sufficient details on the validity and reliability of the instruments employed. If instrument pit testing was done, specifics about the findings must be provided.

D. Population and sample studied:

Information should be provided about the population studied and how the sample was drawn – characteristics of the sample – should be provided.

E. Summarizing the collected evidence:

Here, the researcher should provide the information obtained through charts, graphs, tables, and other visual aids. Analysis and interpretation of the data are necessary. Tables that summarise the essential facts for understanding the interpretation should be included in the text, whereas comprehensive tables go in the appendix. The data presentation ought to be organized by the subproblems and sub-hypotheses.

F. Summary of the findings

For the convenience of the reader, a summary of data and their interpretation should be presented towards the end of this chapter and point out what has been revealed by the data.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

Analysis of reforms in Pakistani secondary education curriculum: research proposal

Introduction

Everyone is aware of the value of education. In the modern world, it is essential to a country’s existence. Education shapes countries and shapes their future. Because of this, we need to utilize our education policies wisely, since they will determine our future. Islam also taught us the value of education and its significance in life. “To know Allah” is the true purpose of education in Islam, yet I believe that we have genuinely lost our way as a nation. Our children are not taught about this in our madrassas or Islamic Education Centres. We merely get ready to give them “Money” at school.

Problem Statement

There are several Islamic scholars who, with the aid of the Holy Quran, possess knowledge in a wide range of fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and many more. I believe the existing educational system is confining them rather than broadening our children’s horizons. Our kids are incredibly gifted; all they need is the proper guidance and environment to become the next Quaid-e-Azam, Allama Iqbal, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Alberoni, Abnalhasam, Einstein, Newton, or Thomas Edison. Our current educational system is no longer functional. We must figure out how to reduce the distance between the madrassa and the school. It is “the ultimate goal of education for young people to teach themselves throughout their lives,” according to Robert Maynard Hutchins. We need to provide our kids with a means of self-education. “Education is a better protection for freedom than the military,” declared Edward Everett. Regretfully, Pakistan allocates more funds to our weaponry than to education that fulfills our educational mission!

Read: The significance of samples in research. Discuss various sampling techniques

Objectives

Our instruction goes beyond only getting students ready for the “Financial Machine.” What is the reason for putting our children in a prestigious, large school when we are adding more books to their already heavy workload? Is it purely social? However, at our madrassas, we are preparing for those who struggle greatly to fit into contemporary society. There are moments when they appear to be extraterrestrial. A student at a madrassa cannot compete, not even in our nation where the planet is so far away. Even talking to a schoolboy is quite tough for her. While it is true that contemporary education is required for everyone to compete in this world, it is equally evident that Muslims must get an Islamic education.

Methodology

Let’s talk about our policymakers now; it appears that they are not working hard enough. The government reviews the education policy each year, but the outcomes remain the same. A new survey indicates that Pakistan’s rate of illiteracy is on the rise. Someone establishing “Parha Likha Punjab,” “Nai Roshni School,” etc. What is Pakistan supposed to teach? Well, in my opinion, no. For the past 60 years, these “People” have been manipulating our country purely out of greed and desire. As we correctly educate our children, should we also be thinking about their education? What shall we do if not? Work must be done immediately, or it will be too late in Pakistan!

Preliminary Literature Review

The principal conclusions and suggestions of the study are Pakistan has the second greatest number of unenrolled students in the world—millions—despite the country’s law requiring all children between the ages of five and sixteen to get a free, obligatory education. The public education system continues to offer inadequate education to meet the needs of the constantly expanding labor market, and the curriculum is faulty, encouraging xenophobia and prejudice towards other religions. In addition to contributing to religious fanaticism and sectarian bloodshed, poorly run madrasas and religious institutions replaced the defunct community education system.

After decades of neglect, the state has to act quickly to increase funding for low-income education programs, make sure that foreign help in this area increases rather than decreases the state’s financial commitment, and make wise changes to curricula, bureaucracy, instructors, and methodologies.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

The significance of samples in research. Discuss various sampling techniques

The quest for universally applicable principles is the main goal of research. The majority of studies apply treatments to a limited subset of the population and gather data for analysis and conclusion-making. There are several pragmatic reasons for doing this. Certain populations can be so big that it would be prohibitively costly and time-consuming to quantify their features. When dealing with extremely huge populations—such as all Pakistani primary school students or all automobiles registered in the nation—the process of gathering data may take so long that, by the time the researcher finishes his investigation, the population may have changed. If such were the case, the findings from the research would not apply to the altered population, whose makeup may have been impacted by a higher percentage of new enrollees and a smaller percentage of repeaters and dropouts.

In certain situations, it might seem possible to gather information by conducting an exhaustive census of the entire population, but in the majority of other cases, sampling would allow one to draw reliable conclusions or generalizations from the data gathered from a small percentage of the population. The sample size’s sufficiency determines how accurately we can make these Quake generalizations or inferences. The researcher is not the only one who uses sampling extensively. Everybody uses sampling in their daily lives. We remove one or two peanuts from the seller, remove the shell to check whether the nuts seem healthy, and then taste the peanuts to determine if they have been cooked to our satisfaction. We depart if the quality of the contents of these sampled peanuts does not meet our standards.

Likewise, our perceptions of organizations and people are frequently shaped by snippets of our interactions with them. We might not always make purposeful attempts to get high-quality samples, thus the conclusions we make in daily life based on samples may not always be accurate. Conversely, the researcher uses the following sampling strategies to create samples:

• randomly selected;
• representative;
• sufficiently large; and
• controlled for extraneous variables.

Read: Classification of tests: the validity and reliability of tests as research tools

Type of Samples

Non-probability and probability are the two fundamental categories of samples. What separates the two is primarily that in the former case, it is impossible to calculate the likelihood that every person has an equal chance of joining the sample. To clarify the distinction, consider the example that follows. Let’s say a researcher visits elementary school principals to gather information from those that allow the headmasters to provide their pupils for study purposes. He visits many schools, gathering information until he reaches his 250-point goal. This one is an illustration of a non-probability sample. In contrast, g gathers a comprehensive list of all class V students enrolled in schools, writes each student’s name on a separate slip, places all the slips in a drum or container, and then draws 250 slips, one at a time, after repeatedly rotating or shaking the container. This allows him to create a probability sample. Because each student has an equal chance of being included in the sample, this is known as a probability sample.

Non-probability sampling

The majority of social science research uses non-probability-type samples. Subjects are typically used when they are easily accessible to the researcher. For instance, a researcher may enroll in two distinct courses if they are interested in comparing two distinct pedagogical approaches. We refer to these samples as inadvertent or accidental samples. Entering a sizable department shop, an investigator may sample the prices of necessities by taking note of the costs of every item on offer. Incidental or inadvertent samples are used by a drug examiner who is gathering samples of medications accessible in a large pharmacy.

Quotation sampling is another kind of non-probability sampling. Using this procedure, the proportions of the population’s different subgroups are first discovered, and the sample is then selected to have the same percentages (typically not in a random manner). For instance, a researcher examining the mathematical prowess of high school students includes both males and females in the fraction of students known to be enrolled in high schools. Comparably, a researcher may take into account the proportion of urban and rural instructors in the population when examining the attitudes of high school teachers about the removal of the ban on student unions.

Purposive sampling is the third kind of non-probability sampling in research. A sample that is purposefully chosen is chosen at random because there is strong evidence supporting its high level of population representation. Given that the candidate with the highest number of votes in the Islamabad Capital Territory’s rural regions has historically won the National Assembly seat, anybody attempting to forecast the outcome of the next election from this constituency may choose to sample solely the voters’ preferences in this area. Alternatively, if one is aware that the Faisalabad wholesale market has historically mirrored national trends, one may use the trend in cotton prices there alone to forecast the trend in cotton prices for all other markets in the nation.

Probability sampling

A planned and systematic process of selecting samples from the population so that every member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample is known as probability sampling. For instance, if a sample of two students is to be taken from a class of ten students (S1. S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10), one can create five pairs of students so that each student appears only once in a pair. Five pairs can be combined in a wide variety of ways, and any pair can be chosen.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

Classification of tests: the validity and reliability of tests as research tools

According to Carrington (1994), a test is a sample of responses, conduct, goods, or performances from a certain domain.
Similar to scales and inventories, tests are tools for evaluation (The New Standards for Psychological and Educational Testing, published in 1999).
A device used to collect a sample of a person’s behaviors. (Yun and Allen, 1979).
Test scores will forecast performance levels; when needed, the student will figure out how to put the pieces back together in relevant contexts. Cann, 2000).

Classification of tests:

These evaluation tools have been divided into several categories. You may classify people into the following two broad categories as a fundamental starting point:

a. What the person can accomplish (his talents); and

b. What the person will do (his distinctive behavior revealing his personality).

A few descriptive categories based on the instrument’s purpose or function are listed below.

a. Achievement tests:

Achievement tests, often referred to as proficiency exams, provide information on an individual’s knowledge base, level of accomplishment, and ability to solve issues and do tasks. These exams are designed to gauge a person’s current performance level and level of mastery in a subject or skill as a result of receiving training. These assessments gauge aptitude in a particular subject, such as maths, reading, spelling, or typing. Performance is measured in several areas by certain accomplishment batteries.

Achievement tests can be used, among other things, to determine a person’s strengths and weaknesses and to assess the impact of a course of study, teachers, and other educational resources. These tests can also be used to compare two teaching methods, courses of study, textbooks, etc., and to determine which groups are equivalent to serve as control and experimental groups. They can also be used to measure the progress made by the experimental and control groups by administering the test before and after the treatment.

b. Aptitude tests:

The purpose of aptitude tests is to evaluate an individual’s potential for success in a given academic or professional domain. Put differently, aptitude exams aim to forecast a person’s potential for achieving higher performance with further instruction. It was precisely because accomplishment tests were determined to be reliable indicators of academic performance that the earlier academic aptitude tests were developed. To determine a person’s potential for future growth given the required training, aptitude tests examine an individual’s current performance, including performance in certain areas where they have not received particular instruction. The mechanical, motor coordination, artistic, and aptitude for medicine, engineering, computers, languages, stenography, and other fields may all be measured with aptitude tests.

Scores on various talents are obtained via aptitude tests. These assessments give a thorough picture of a person’s general strengths and limitations or ability profile. After receiving the required training, this profile may be compared against the profiles of people who have succeeded in a variety of occupations to identify the field or fields in which he has the highest chance of success.

c. Personality tests:

A vast subset of psychological testing focuses on the non-cognitive facets of human activity. Most frequently, personality tests are used to examine these kinds of traits and viewpoints. The majority of these assessments are typically self-reporting tools. The person examines his answers to specific questions on his behavior patterns and preferred course of action in various scenarios. These instruments could not be very useful since it is hard, impossible, or unfeasible for people to precisely or impartially describe their own emotions. Two major categories may be used to group personality assessments.

i) Personality questionnaires:

In recent years self-report instruments have come to be used for personality assessment. One of the methods used in the construction of personality questionnaires is to make up a very large number of questions and then to determine by experimental studies which items discriminate between normal persons and groups of individuals known to deviate from the normal.

ii) Projective technique

In recent years, psychologists have focused a lot of emphasis on a novel method of personality assessment. The reason the new techniques are dubbed “projective” is that they allow subjects to project their traits onto how they would react to an ambiguous, hazy scenario. This method is predicated on the idea that, when a person is liberated from societal norms, he is more likely to be authentic and see the world in his unique light. The circumstances are deliberately left open-ended so that he is less able to falsify his sincere answers to appear favorable.

Read: Observation types and record-keeping methods

Reliability

If the same result is obtained from a test several times, it is considered reliable. The consistency of the respondents’ scores on subsequent tests is referred to as the test’s reliability. A test’s reliability may be assessed in three different ways.

(1) A large number of people may take a test, have it retaken, and then calculate the coefficient of correlation between the test and retest results.

(2) A large-scale test with many items may be given only once, but each participant may receive two scores—one for even-numbered things and another for odd-numbered items.

The reliability of the test might be determined by calculating the coefficient of correlation between these two scores. The test may be developed in many formats since prior familiarity with one form may render a retake unfair. To determine the reliability coefficient, subject scores on the two forms may be connected.

Validity

The validity of a test is determined by how well it truly measures the objectives it was designed to evaluate. There must be an independent standard for the characteristic being tested to establish test validity. For instance, the results of pupils’ most recent school exams in English might serve as criteria for certifying an English proficiency test. The results of a student’s first exam after starting college, which is a scholastic aptitude test, might also be utilized as the standard. Test validity is the degree of connection that exists between test results and criteria scores. In conclusion, the user should confirm for themselves before utilizing a test that:

The test is valid and sufficiently trustworthy, it has been standardized on a subject group similar to the one he intends to employ, it has been created to assess what he wants to measure, and it has high validity.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

Observation types and record-keeping methods

Observation as a research method has to be methodical, narrowly focused and well-documented with a clear goal in mind. It needs to go through the standard processes of validity, reliability, and accuracy tests like any other research technique. The observer has to be aware of exactly what to watch out for and notice. The validity and reliability of observations are enhanced when the same observer makes them frequently.

Observations may be direct or indirect, scheduled or unscheduled, and known or unknown. A more normal view of activity may be observed from unknown, unscheduled, indirect observations such as through a one-way-vision glass. People are known to have committed minor crimes to get a true picture of prison conditions.

Read: Resorcinol uses, mechanism of action, and side effects

Methods of Recording Observations

Several tools have become widely employed to help in the recording of data gathered through observation. These tools aid in the researcher’s ability to concentrate on certain occurrences, make precise and impartial observations, and organize the data-gathering process.

a. Check-list:

Comprising a pre-made list of objects, the checklist is the most basic gadget. You can select “Yes” or “No” to indicate if the items are there, or you can enter the relevant phrase or number to indicate the kind and quantity of things. Observation recording is made easier and more systematic using this straightforward “laundry list” kind of gadget, which also ensures that significant details about the item or behavior being observed are taken into account.

b. Rating scale:

A rating scale is used for qualitative description of a limited number of aspects of a thing or traits of a person. In this device, the aspects of the thing or the traits of a person are rated on a five or seven-point scale from the highest to the lowest.

c. Scorecard:

The scorecard, which shares some similarities with the rating scale and cheek list, often allows for the evaluation of a sizable number of factors. Furthermore, each feature or element has a preset point value associated with its existence or rating. As a result, a total weighted score based on the scorecard rating may be obtained and applied to the object’s evaluation. Score ratings are widely employed in assessments of schools, communities, construction projects, and textbooks. It is occasionally employed in the process of determining a school’s overall rating.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

Interview and its various types. The main steps in the conduct of an interview

Interview

A conversation or discussion between an applicant and a possible employer is called an interview. This selection procedure is intended to assist an employer in assessing a candidate’s abilities, evaluating their character and personality, and verifying their topic expertise. During this official interview, the company probes the candidate to learn more about them. Interviews often take place in the last stages of the hiring process and assist businesses in choosing an appropriate applicant for a position. In an interview, you can inquire about the work duties, but the interviewer may question you about their expected income.

Types of Interviews

There are many types of interviews. Some of them are (a) individual and group interviews; (b) structured or standardized interviews; (c) unstructured or unstandardized interviews (d) non-directive depth interviews; and (e) focussed interviews, and they have been discussed below.

a. Individual and group interviews:

The majority of interviews are conducted in a discreet setting, with one topic at a time, to allow the subject to openly and honestly express himself. Occasionally, people with similar or different experiences are brought together to discuss an issue or assess the merits of a proposal. They can offer a variety of perspectives and a broad range of information. They can also support one another in remembering, confirming, or correcting facts. Participants may choose not to bring up certain topics in front of the group that they may discuss in a private interview.

b. Structured ‘or standardized interviews:

The format, order, and wording of the questions are predetermined for the standardized interviews. That implies that each subject receives the same questions in the same format and sequence, and the options for possible replies are limited to a preset list. The introduction and conclusion are also presented methodically. There may be very limited leeway in the questions an interviewer may ask. This liberty is pre-specified. Standardized interviews employ meticulously prepared interview schedules (questionnaires) to gather data relevant to the study question. Because of the restrictions that are introduced by the standardized technique, which allows for generalization, a structured interview is more scientific than an unstructured one.

c. Unstructured and unstandardized interviews:

Open-ended, unstructured interviews are far more adaptable. Although the questions are dictated by the study goals, the interviewers have complete control over their substance, order, and language, and they can modify them to fit the needs of the participants and the circumstances. At times, subjects are encouraged to openly share their opinions. An informal, unstructured interview allows one to probe past first responses, investigate surprising hints, and refocus the question based on new information that emerges and leads to a more insightful data analysis. Unstructured interviews are useful tools in the exploratory phase of research, but they are not often utilized for testing and validating ideas. Insight into social interaction and human motivation may also be gained, allowing him to develop useful theories.

d. Non-directive depth interview:

There is another term for a non-directive depth interview: an unguided interview. It has an almost analytical quality, making it the best approach at times to gain an understanding of unspoken attitudes, hidden or underlying motivations, the interconnectedness of reactions, and individual desires, anxieties, and conflicts. To get precise information, an interviewer allows the subject to speak freely and in-depth about a certain topic, incident, or relationship rather than bombarding them with a series of straight or prearranged questions. The interviewer acts as an attentive listener while the subject tells his tale, gently introducing “remarks” that he finds fascinating or encouraging him to “go on” or do other actions to encourage the conversations. As the interviewee is about to conclude, the interviewer could follow up with a few pointed questions to wrap up the conversation. Through the conversation, the interviewer can elicit a natural and representative picture of the subject’s conduct and obtain insight into the type and intensity of his attitudes, intentions, feelings, and beliefs by putting minimal constraints on the path of the topic and encouraging a wide variety of replies.

e. Focussed interview:

It draws emphasis to a specific event the interviewee has had. For instance, he attempts to find out the precise details of the experience—such as whether he watched a movie or read a book—that he has experienced. To delve deeper into the subject’s mindset and feelings, the interviewer studies the film or book in-depth before meeting him, formulates pertinent questions that will act as a guide for the conversation, and keeps the topic of discussion focused on these important matters during the interview. Although the interviewer guides the conversation, the respondent is free to fully express himself.

Read: Uses and Limitations of Questionnaire. How is it different from Opinionnaire

Conduct of an Interview

To remove ambiguity and poorly worded questions, the interviewer must get training and have the questions pretested and amended. The interviewer’s prejudice must be removed with extra care, and questions must be examined for any hidden biases. Ultimately, the use of interviews must depend on the specific research question and the type of data being sought.
The steps involved have been outlined below:

a. Preparation for the interviews:

An interview can only provide the intended outcome if the required pre-work has been completed beforehand. The type of information the interviewer is looking for must be clearly defined. He has to plan out the most effective question sequences in detail and consider an engaging manner that will consistently elicit the required answers from the subject. A prepared schedule, checklist, or outline will give the interview a clear direction and guarantee that the interviewer will get all pertinent information during the conversation.

b. Establishing rapport:

The intimate nature of the relationship that exists between you, the interviewer, and the interviewee calls for a level of skill and tact that could almost be considered an art. Gaining the interviewee’s trust and cooperation is an important first step. Having a cordial conversation with the interviewee on something they are interested in will frequently allay any anger or distrust. Like with questionnaires, you as the interviewer need to be able to reassure the subject (interviewee) that his answers will be treated with the utmost confidentiality.

c. Recording interview:

It is quite easy and affordable to record interviews on tape, which eliminates the need for writing during the interview. Both the interviewer and the applicant may find writing during the interview to be distracting. Tape-recorded interviews can be viewed again for a thorough and impartial review. The recordings capture not just the words but also the respondent’s emotional effect and voice tone.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

Uses and Limitations of Questionnaire. How is it different from Opinionnaire

Uses of Questionnaire

Here are a few uses for questionnaire:
A few writers include sampling as one of their research strategies. Given the significance of sampling procedures, this unit has been dedicated only to them. Since questionnaires are filled out by large respondents in the absence of enterers, they may be rather affordable to implement.
They may be sent out swiftly and affordably to responders by mail, or they can be given out all at once to a gathering of individuals. Respondents feel satisfied that their answers won’t be used against them in any manner since they are frequently made to protect respondents’ identity. As a result, they will answer more honestly than they otherwise might.

They can be standardized such that the printed questions are the same for every reply. Conversely, during an interview, the interviewer’s questioning style may have an impact on the respondent’s responses.

Limitations of Questionnaire

The questionnaire has the following limitations:
a. It’s possible that the answers aren’t accurate or true. To avoid embarrassing admissions and to give a positive impression, a respondent may intentionally make fewer mistakes (such as writing incorrect numbers or checking incorrect responses); he may also intentionally make mistakes; finally, he may make mistakes because he misinterprets questions or does not fully comprehend his attitudes, feelings, or actions.
b. The rate of replies to the sent questionnaires is poor. It can be the result of non-responses or postal waste, which might range from 20% to 40%. Pakistan may have a low incidence of between 40% and 60%.

Read this article: The steps to follow while constructing questionnaires as research tool

Opinionnaire and Attitude Scale

An opinionnaire, often known as an attitude scale, is a list of inquiries designed to gauge a person’s beliefs or attitude. The fundamental tenet of this approach is that the opinions provided in response to the questions accurately represent the respondent’s attitude. However, this may not always be the case because either the respondent may not be fully aware of his feelings regarding a social issue or he may not have given it much thought. The respondent may occasionally make a conscious effort to hide his true feelings and present a positive image of himself.

To create an opinion questionnaire, several statements reflecting concepts or organizations are gathered. Then, either using the Thurstone methodology, these assertions are presented to a group of judges and experts, or using the Likert method, they are given to several participants. Values for each item (under the Thurstone approach) or each of an item’s five replies (under the Likert method) are calculated based on an examination of the data that has been thusly gathered. This enables the measurement of respondents’ answers and the creation of a subject’s attitude score. The opinionnaire allows for the computation of scores for each responder, in contrast to a questionnaire where the answers of a group of respondents on each item/question must be tallied and published individually. In experimental research investigations, the attitude ratings of participants are especially valuable and may be employed in many ways.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger

The steps to follow while constructing questionnaires as research tool

The questionnaire is a popular research tool because it is easy for you to ask questions. However, it’s not a simple task to ask the right questions to gather accurate and trustworthy data. Frequently, you are taken aback when people interpret questions that you believe to be crystal plain in various ways. When your colleagues identify biases in the phrasing or organization of your questionnaire, even if it appears to be completely neutral to you, you could become enraged. The steps that you must perform when creating questionnaires as research tool are listed below.

a. Framing of questions:

Have you properly investigated your hypothesis, past experiences, literature, and previous surveys to create questions that are framed in clear, straightforward language with a narrowly defined meaning? Is a comprehensive list of options offered in order to examine several facets of important responses, or are arc-subordinate questions posed? Do the questions have a purpose in mind when they are asked? Here are some questions and their corresponding answers to assist you in determining what data is required, which questions to choose, and how to design and assess them.

Read: Different Types of Questionnaires Used in Behavioral Research

b. Ordering of questions:

Are the questions arranged in a logical or psychologically sound order, with neutral, intriguing questions coming before more challenging, important, or personal ones, and questions that establish a framework or offer a way to remember information coming before those that require specifics? Is there a seamless transition between each set of questions? A technical solid basis for ordering the questions will be provided by providing positive responses to these queries.

c. Designing the directions and format:

Regarding the kind and extent of information requested, are there precise and comprehensive instructions provided? Are the questions, categories, and instructions created to elicit clear, correct responses in the least amount of time possible from the respondent? These are the kinds of questions that are helpful in creating the structure and guidelines for the survey.

d. Eliciting honest replies:

Are instructions, inquiries, and directives given in a way that eliminates the respondent’s worries, misgivings, humiliation, or hostility? Is there an assurance that answers to personal inquiries will be kept strictly confidential or that anonymity will be guaranteed? Are there any questions that are biassed or constructed in a way that would encourage answers that confirm the researcher’s theories? Are informational questions regarding topics they don’t know much about being asked of respondents? Do particular inquiries serve as a means of verifying the veracity of responses to broad inquiries? Are similar questions posed to verify the coherence of responses? If one closely adheres to the following criteria for question writing, one can search for suitable answers to each of these questions.

Read our blog: AABMS Blogger