The day-to-day operations of the educational system sometimes disregard evaluation. One of the more crucial elements of the organization’s quality of effort may be the continuous assessment of its staff, programs, and activities.
Numerous factors, including state legislation, the state board of education regulations, municipal policy, graduation requirements, federal law, and student needs, all need programs to be implemented. Programming must be provided to the target audience once it has been produced for them in order to determine whether the planners’ goals were met. Teachers start programs all too frequently, and their success is left up to divine judgment.
Evaluation initiatives should be started and continued in order to support programs and budgets in this day of accountability, prudent use of limited resources, and growing competition for local and state tax dollars.
There is no doubt that a thorough review process is necessary, especially when one considers the implications of site-based management (SBM) and everything it involves. The assessment procedure ought to start now that the programs have been planned. As part of the assessment procedure, the following queries ought to be looked at:
1. Is the target population being served?
2. Is the program producing the desired results?
3. Is the programme cost-effective?
4. Is the program compatible with other programs?
5. Does the program support the mission of the school?
Read: An overview of the selection and arrangement of teaching method
The ability of the assessment process and design to function independently as a separate organizational function is necessary for the planning process’s viability and integrity. Evaluation should ideally be separate from all other school system functions, even if it is strongly related to and supportive of the planning process. This independence ensures that any project or activity will be evaluated based on its own merits and performance, in addition to allowing for more impartiality in the process.
The ideal way to carry out the evaluation role is to place it under the superintendent’s direction and keep it separate from all other school organization functions. The assessment process should ideally collect data and present it in a way that allows the decision-maker (principal, director, superintendent, board, etc.) to understand the information and determine what has to be done next.
The act of defining, gathering, and offering pertinent data to assess different options for decisions is called evaluation. To put it another way, evaluation is a method of producing facts from which choices may be made. At its most objective, it allows for the examination of different scenarios and facts, allowing the individual making the choice to reach the most desirable and fruitful conclusion.
Read our blog: AABMS Blogger
