Curriculum Development Model
Ralph W. Tyler’s impact was particularly noticeable in the areas of curriculum and testing, where he developed a justification for curriculum planning within the context of educational policy and expanded the concept of measurement into a more expansive conception known as evaluation.
Tyler began his teaching career in South Dakota as a science teacher before attending the University of Chicago to work for a doctorate in educational psychology. His study at Chicago under Charles Judd and W.W. Charters led to a focus on teaching and testing in his studies. After earning his degree in 1927, Tyler accepted a position at the University of North Carolina, where he collaborated with state educators to enhance curricula. Tyler accompanied W. W. Charters to Ohio State University (OSU) in 1929.
In 1953, Tyler became the first director of the Stanford, California-based Centre for Advanced Study in the Behavioural Sciences, a position he held until his retirement in 1966. Since the release of Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, Tyler has gained more recognition as an authority on education. Tyler earned the title of “father of behavioral objectives” due to his emphasis on tying goals to experience (teaching) and assessment. Ralph W. Tyler, who is frequently referred to as the “grandfather of curriculum design,” was greatly impacted by the Progressive Education movement of the 1920s, John Dewey, and Edward Thorndike. Thorndike shifted the focus of curriculum inquiry from the relative merits of many topics to actual studies of modern society.Dewey advocated for the inclusion of students’ interests in the creation of learning objectives and activities. Tyler focused on the student’s ideas, sentiments, and emotions in addition to their intelligence.
Read: The use of observation, interview, and content analysis in qualitative research
The curriculum rationale
A course syllabus utilized by generations of college students as a foundational reference for curriculum and instruction creation, Ralph Tyler’s Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction is one of his most valuable contributions.
In four 1949 questions, Tyler outlined the foundation for his program. In order to design a curriculum plan of instruction, Tyler explained his reasoning for the curriculum in terms of four questions that he said needed to be addressed.
1. What educational purposes should the school seek to attain?
2. What educational experiences can be provided that will likely attain these purposes?
3. How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?
4. How can we determine whether the purposes are being attained?
A four-step approach that includes defining objectives, choosing learning experiences, arranging learning experiences, and assessing the curriculum can be developed from these questions. These processes are essentially explained in the Tyler reasoning.
Additionally, the reasoning emphasized a significant group of variables to be evaluated in relation to the inquiries. According to Tyler, the curriculum’s framework must also take into account three key components that together constitute the essential components of an educational experience:
(1) the nature of the learner (developmental factors, learner interests and needs, life experiences, etc.);
(2) the values and aims of society (democratizing principles, values and attitudes); and
(3) knowledge of subject matter (what is believed to be worthy and usable knowledge).
Curriculum designers have to filter their decisions through the three elements when responding to the four questions and creating the educational experience for kids.
This logic illustrates the enigmatic difference between grasping the underlying unifying concepts of the knowledge and memorizing its discrete parts. Tyler argued that this is the method by which meaningful education takes place, but he added a disclaimer that one should not mistake “knowing facts” for “being educated.” In fact, learning is more than just hearing about things; it also entails seeing examples of what may be accomplished with them. Tyler seems to be saying that a person who is properly educated has not only learned specific facts but has also changed the way they behave. (As a result, a lot of educators associate him with the idea of behavioral targets.) The knowledgeable individual can handle a variety of circumstances thanks to these behavioral patterns, not just the ones in which the learning occurred.
Tyler’s reasoning has drawn flak for being blatantly hierarchical and linear in how it relates to the curriculum in schools. It has been criticized for being out of date and theoretical, fit only for administrators who are determined to control the curriculum in ways that don’t take into account the needs of instructors and students. The most well-known critique of the reasoning argues that it has historically been linked to traditions of social efficiency.
Read: Analysis of reforms in Pakistani secondary education curriculum: research proposal
Tylor’s Curriculum Development Model
Ralph W. Tyler: Model of Behavior is arguably the most often cited theoretical formulation in the topic of curriculum.The Tyler model is deductive; it starts with the general and moves toward the particular, such as defining educational objectives, by looking at societal demands. In addition, the model follows a predetermined path from start to finish; it is linear. However, linear models don’t have to be unchangeable step sequences. Regarding the sites of entrance and connections between model components, curriculum designers are free to use their discretion. Furthermore, the model is prescriptive; it makes recommendations for what should be done and what many curriculum developers really do.
Additionally, it is more “society-centered” than the social reconstruction curriculum. This approach presented the curriculum in schools as a means of enhancing communal life. As a result, the primary curriculum’s source is the demands and issues surrounding social issues. According to Tyler (1990), there are three types of resources that can be used to define the goal of education: people (children as students), modern life, and professional evaluation of the subject of study.
This methodology for developing curriculum focuses more on how to create a curriculum that aligns with the objectives and mission of a learning institution. According to Taylor (1990), when developing a curriculum, four basic factors are taken into account: the learning objectives to be met, the learning experience itself, the organization of the learning experiences, and the evaluation.
Read our blog: AABMS Blogger